Deep Nutrition, Why your genes need traditional food - Part 1

So here’s one of the views on nutrition I’ve been studying. I love getting different views on things. I certainly have my own bias and beliefs and view the world through those lenses but it is good to hear a multitude of perspectives. This doesn’t mean I wholeheartedly accept every belief from any particular author I present but I certainly can learn from them.

As in all my posts and life in general, I don’t hold tightly to a lot of my opinions for several reasons: 1. they change J I fully acknowledge that the more I learn and experience, the more I change as a person, including my beliefs; 2. I fully believe that we are all created as a beautiful, unique, and special person and what is true for me is just that; true for me. I never present anything here as a passing judgement or a broad recommendation but rather a chance for you to evaluate something, if you care to, and then compare that to what you're doing and see how that is working for you.

All of my posts are informational and/or educational only. As so many of you have supported me in the last few years and asked me to keep you up to date with my journey, this is my effort to do so. Hope you enjoy reading about my journey as much as I am enjoying the journey itself!
Much peace a love J
Mary

Book: Deep Nutrition, Why your genes need traditional food – Part 1
(Part 2 will just be notes from her Four Pillars as described below)
Author: Dr. Catherine Shanahan & Luke Shanahan

There’s a plethora of information out there on nutrition (most of it diametrically opposed to itself) and certainly all coming from the author’s bias. I encourage you to remember that no one knows your body like you do!
This is not a book review but just a compilation of some of her writing that made me pause and think. I have not given my opinion either way on what I’ve read. You’re intelligent and can use your own judgement J

Her main premise: “To identify the most nutritious foods, Luke and I have studied traditions from all over the world. The goal was not to identify the “best” traditions, but to understand what all traditions have in common. We identified four universal elements, each of which represents a distinct set of ingredients along with the cooking (or other preparation technique), that maximize the nutrition delivered to our cells. For the bulk of human history, these techniques and materials have proved indispensable. The reason that so many of us have health problems today is that we no longer eat in accordance with any culinary tradition. In the worse cases of recurring illnesses and chronic diseases that I see, more often than not, the victim’s parents and grandparents haven’t either. This means that most Americans are carrying around very sick genes. But by returning to the same four categories of nourishing foods our ancestors ate – the “Four Pillars” – our personal genetic health will be regained.” –page 15-16
Her 4 pillars are: 1. Meat cooked on the bone; 2. Organs and offal; 3. Fresh (raw) plant and animal products; and 4. Fermented and sprouted – page 20; I will cover her thoughts on this in Part 2 of this post

“Fifty years of removing foods containing these nutrients from our diets – foods like eggs, fresh cream, and liver – to replace them with low-fat or outright artificial chemicals – liked trans-rich margarine – would have starved our genes of the chemical information on which they’ve come to depend. Simply by cutting eggs and sausage (originally  made with lactic acid starter culture instead of nitrates, and containing chunks of white cartilage) from our breakfasts to replace them with cold cereals would mean that generations of children have been fed fewer fats, B vitamins, and collagenous proteins than required for optimal growth. Here’s why. The yolk of an egg is full of brain-building fats, including lecithin, phospholipids, and (only if from free-range chickens) essential fatty acids and vitamins A and D. Meanwhile, low-fat diets have been shown to reduce intelligence in animals. B vitamins play key roles in the development of every organ system, and women with vitamin B deficiencies give birth to children prone to developing weak bones, diabetes, and more. Chunks of cartilage supply us with collagen and glycosaminoglycans, factors that help facilitate the growth of robust connective tissues, which would help to prevent later-life tendon and ligament problems – including shin splints!” – page 14

“The health of your genes represents a kind of inheritance. Two ways of thinking about this inheritance, genetic wealth and genetic momentum, help explain why some people can abuse this inheritance and, for a time, get away with it. Just as a lazy student born into a prominent family can be assured he’ll get into Yale no matter his grades, healthy genes don’t have to be attended to very diligently in order for their owner’s bodies to look beautiful. The next generation, however, will pay the price. We’ve all seen the twenty-year-old supermodel who abuses her body with cigarettes and Twinkies. For years, her beautiful skeletal architecture will still shine through. Beneath the surface, poor nutrition will deprive those bones of what they need, thinning them prematurely. The connective tissue supporting her skin will begin to break down, stealing way her beauty. Most importantly, deep inside her ovaries, inside each egg, her genes will be affected. Those deleterious genetic alterations mean that her child will have lost genetic momentum and will not have the same potential for health or beauty as she did. He or she may benefit from mom’s sizable financial portfolio – a la Danielynn Nichole Smith – but junior’s genetic wealth will, unfortunately, have been drawn down.” - page 16

“My own father grew up drinking powdered milk and ate margarine on Wonderbread every day at lunch. My mother spent much of her childhood in postwar Europe, where dairy products were scarce. Because they had inherited genetic wealth from their parents, my parents never had significant soft tissue problems in spite of these shortcomings. But those suboptimal diets did take a toll on their genes. Much of the genetic wealth of my family line had been squandered by the time I was born. Unlike my parents and grandparents, I had to struggle to keep my joints from falling apart. Fortunately for me, my story is not over – and neither is yours. Thanks to the plasticity of genetic response we can all improve the health of our genes and rebuild our genetic wealth.” – page 17

“Every cell of your body contains a nucleus, floating within the cytoplasm like the yolk inside an egg. The nucleus holds your chromosomes, 46 super-coiled molecules, and each one of those contains up to 300 million pairs of genetic letters, called nucleic acids. These colorless, gelatinous chemicals (visible to the naked eye only when billions of copies are reproduced artificially in the lab) constitute the genetic materials that make you who you are. If you stretched out the DNA in one of your cells, its 2.8 billion base pairs would end up totaling two to three meters long. The DNA from all your cells strung end to end would reach to the moon and back at least 5000 times. That’s a lot of chemical information. But your genes take up only two percent of it. The rest of the sequence – the other 98 percent – is what scientists used to call “junk.” Not that they thought this remaining DNA was useless; they just didn’t know what any of it was for. In the last two decades, scientists have discovered this material has some amazing abilities. Epigenetic researchers exploring this expansive genetic territory are finding a hidden world of ornate complexity. Unlike genes, which function as a relatively static repository of encoded data, the so-called “Junk DNA” seems designed for change, both over the short term – within our lifetimes – and over periods of several generations, and longer. It appears that Junk DNA assists biology in making key decisions, like turning one stem cell into part of an eye, and another stem cell with identical DNA into, say, part of your liver. These decisions seem to be made based on environmental influences.” – page 23-24

“In a sense, our lifestyles teach our genes how to behave. In choosing between healthy or unhealthy foods and habits, we are programming our genes for either good or bad conduct.” – page 26

“What fascinates me most is the intelligence of the system. It seems our genes have found ways to take notes, to remind themselves what to do with the various nutrients they are fed. Here’s how. Let’s say a gene for building bone is tagged with two epigenetic markers, one that binds to vitamin D and another that binds to calcium. And let’s say that when vitamin D and calcium are both bound to their respective markers at the same time, the gene uncoils and can be expressed. If there is no calcium and no vitamin D, then the gene remains dormant and less bone is built. The epigenetic regulatory tags are effectively serving as a kind of Post-it note: When there’s lots of vitamin D and calcium around, make a bunch of the protein encoded for right here. When they do, voila! You’re building bone! It’s truly an elegant design.” – page 27

“What helps regulate all these cellular events? Food, mostly. After all, food is the primary way we interact with our environment. But here’s what’s really remarkable: Those tags that get placed on the genes to control how they work and help drive the course of evolution are made out of simple nutrients, like minerals, vitamins, and fatty acids, or are influenced by the presence of these nutrients. In other words, there’s essentially no middleman between the food you eat and what your genes are being told to do, enacting changes that can ultimately become permanent and inheritable. If food can alter genetic information in the space of a single generation, then this powerful and immediate relationship between diet and DNA should place nutritional shifts at the front of the stage in the continuing drama of human evolution.” – page 31

“Our genes are not written in stone. They are exquisitely sensitive to how we treat them.” – page 35

“Even today, outside of the field of medicine, many life-science professionals apply their ability to judge physical attractiveness without hesitation. When a farmer or a racehorse breeder or a rare orchid grower sees obvious disruptions in healthy growth, they naturally consider the nutritional context in which the specimen was raised. If a prize-winning mare gives birth to a foal with abnormally bowed legs, the veterinarian recognizes that something went wrong and, often, asks the logical question, What was the mother eating? But physicians rarely do that, even when life-threatening problems show up right at birth. And we continue to neglect the nutrition-development equation when our patients develop scoliosis, joint malformations, aneurysm, autism, schizophrenia, and so on later in life. If doctors and nutritionists were as willing to use their basic senses as other professionals, every child would have a better chance to grow up healthy.” – page 37


“Beautiful people exist not because of luck, but because all DNA is naturally driven to create dynamically symmetric geometry as its generating tissue growth. I believe the same mathematic principles that give order to the universe also govern the growth of every part of every living thing. A new discipline, called biomathematics, is all about answering that question. Biomathematicians are confirming that phi and the Fibonacci sequence are encoded not just in the human face, but in living matter everywhere. Biomathematics offers us a fundamentally new perspective of the universe and the living world. It is allowing us to recognize that recurring patterns seen throughout our living landscape are more than just coincidences. They seem to reflect the elemental structure and order of the universe itself. This organizing force, which helps sculpt a beautiful face, also functions during development of the organ with which you recognize beauty: your brain. Within the jelly-like matrix inside our skulls, neurons in the human brain form bifurcating tendrils, called dendrites (meaning branches). We call them dendrites because the earliest scientist who peering at neurons under a microscope were reminded of stately, graceful tress. For us to think and learn, these trees must be properly proportioned. This enchanted forest is the hidden landscape where beautiful minds are born.” – page 45-47